It's been another big week in death, obit fans. No big names, but some truly big characters left this world this week.
Let's start with Lord Revelstoke, shall we? Born James Baring and later the 6th Lord Revelstoke, he was a daredevil flyer, owned a recording studio used by (among others) the Rolling Stones, the Beatles, and Jimi Hendrix, and a consultant to the Oxford Refugee Council. Other than that, he led a rather ordinary life.
I loved the crazy tale of Raymond Scott, "a self-professed Ferrari-owning connoisseur of vintage champagne, beautiful girls and Cuban cigars, [who] sparked a literary sensation in 2008 when he claimed to have unearthed an unknown 1623 First Folio of the collected plays of Shakespeare." By a remarkable coincidence, a strangely similar 1623 First Folio had been stolen 10 years earlier from Durham University, 10 miles from his mother's house. He claimed it had been given to him by the friend of his true love, a dancer he had met in Cuba. So that seems like a reasonable alibi, then. Can't think why that didn't cut the mustard.
Then there's Mira Hamermesh, a documentarian whose own life was just as harrowing as the ones she documented. Born in Poland in 1923, she fled ahead of the Nazis and got to Palestine. Both her parents stayed in Poland and died. She went on to make films about the untouchable caste in India and women living under apartheid in South Africa. As the Telegraph puts in, "her documentaries had explored virtually every regime of oppression except for the Holocaust." Finally, in 1991, she created a film about trying to find her mother's grave in Warsaw, called Loving the Dead.
In baseball news, umpire Harry Wendelstedt died last Friday. As the head of the Al Somers Umpire School, he is responsible for every bad call made by an umpire. Seems reasonable, doesn't it?
I was sad to hear about the death of Donald Smith, champion of Cabaret, as the Times puts it. He created the Mabel Mercer Foundation to promote cabaret singing as an art form, "partly Mr. Smith’s response to obituaries and tributes that misleadingly described Ms. Mercer as a jazz singer." Ah, those obits, meddling in people's lives. Good work, sir, and here's hoping your good work continues.
Last but certainly not least, the tea world lost a giant this week in the death of Noble Fleming, official tea taster for Lipton for almost 50 years. "For decades, starting as a teenage apprentice, Mr. Fleming traveled to tea estates of 1,000 acres or more — primarily in India, Sri Lanka and East Africa — searching for varieties with specific tastes in the way an oenologist knows a chateau wine." I raise my Darjeeling to you, sir.
Saturday, March 17, 2012
Friday, March 16, 2012
Various & Sundry, March 16: Curmudgeons, zombies, muppets
In case you haven't been keeping track of Lent Madness, we're now in the round of Saintly Sixteen, and today is the Battle of the Curmudgeons! Philander Chase faces off against Jerome, and I think it's the end of the road for ol' Phil, there. But that's OK. I like Jerome. Still time to vote, though!
I think my blood pressure has finally returned to normal regarding the Kony 2012 video. One last thing--maybe, we'll see--that I want to pass on to you is this blog post from Independent Global Citizen that answers the question, "So what do I do if I want to make a difference in Africa?" The answer? "My experiences have revealed an effective way to have an impact. Build sincere relationships with Africans. That’s it."
The results of the recent survey asking you what you wanted in The Infusion revealed most of you are not particularly worried about the impending zombie apocalypse. Fine. Be that way. I still think you might want a white chocolate zombie rabbit for Easter. At last a good reason to eat the head off first.
In other blood-spattered news, I'm looking forward to The Happytime Murders, a film noir featuring muppets! Anibundel has the report:
I am so there.
I think my blood pressure has finally returned to normal regarding the Kony 2012 video. One last thing--maybe, we'll see--that I want to pass on to you is this blog post from Independent Global Citizen that answers the question, "So what do I do if I want to make a difference in Africa?" The answer? "My experiences have revealed an effective way to have an impact. Build sincere relationships with Africans. That’s it."
The results of the recent survey asking you what you wanted in The Infusion revealed most of you are not particularly worried about the impending zombie apocalypse. Fine. Be that way. I still think you might want a white chocolate zombie rabbit for Easter. At last a good reason to eat the head off first.
In other blood-spattered news, I'm looking forward to The Happytime Murders, a film noir featuring muppets! Anibundel has the report:
[E]x-cop Phil Phillips...exists in a world where puppets are acknowledged but play second fiddle to humans. Phil is searching for a serial killer who murdered his brother and is now targeting cast members of ’80s television show, The Happytime Gang. The catch? The clues to the killer’s identity begin to point back to Phil himself.
I am so there.
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Kony 2012 is shown in Northern Uganda
It didn't go over well.
More here.
Labels:
philanthropy,
things that irk me,
Uganda
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
One of a kind Barbies
So when your sister comes to visit you and you live in the cultural center that is the San Francisco Bay Area and you want to show her the best your town has to offer, what do you do? Well, since the cupcakery that sold Chicken and Waffle cupcakes has sadly closed, you do the next best thing and take her to One of a Kind Barbies!
Here's how I learned of One of a Kind Barbies:
That's advertising money just can't buy. Well, I guess it can, but most of the time for some reason it just doesn't.
I'd passed by this car a zillion times on the way to Elaine, the fabulous tailor (but that's another story), and it was hard to miss it, but I'd never stopped by the actual storefront before.
But then my artsy sister came a-calling and I knew I had to get in there somehow.
Despite the fact that we stopped by on a Wednesday and she's only officially open on Saturdays, the artist, Lavonne Sallee, was working in the back and opened the store for us.
And can I just say, I had no idea you could make Barbie look quite like this.
This place might just be the Barbie Diorama Capital of the World. Barbie got eaten by dinosaurs, blinged beyond belief, turned into a centaur, re-cast as Kathy Bates' character in Misery, and shish-kebobbed. And if you've ever thought to yourself, "Gee willikers, why won't someone just give Barbie nipples already," well, you're in the right place.
My personal favorite was Barbie's Last Sleepover:
Description: "The lead Barbie is dressed in a white velvet robe as she holds out her arms to welcome her 12 followers. Some are White, some Black, some Asian and some Latin. Each of the 12 is dressed uniquely in a velvet robe with a matching scarf around their hair. Maybe they just took a shower and are eating before the sleep over. I made the bread of Polymer Clay and the glasses of wine out of ear ring findings. They set on benches around a long table covered with an amber velvet cloth." Price: $800.
We must have spent the better part of an hour looking at Barbie in all her various guises. It was...I'm not sure what it was, but it certainly wasn't the usual. Because I take my sister only to the best places in town.
I didn't spend the $800 it would take to own Barbie's Last Sleepover for myself, but I got several cards with this image on it. If you're very nice, maybe I'll send you one for Easter.
Here's how I learned of One of a Kind Barbies:
That's advertising money just can't buy. Well, I guess it can, but most of the time for some reason it just doesn't.
I'd passed by this car a zillion times on the way to Elaine, the fabulous tailor (but that's another story), and it was hard to miss it, but I'd never stopped by the actual storefront before.
But then my artsy sister came a-calling and I knew I had to get in there somehow.
Despite the fact that we stopped by on a Wednesday and she's only officially open on Saturdays, the artist, Lavonne Sallee, was working in the back and opened the store for us.
And can I just say, I had no idea you could make Barbie look quite like this.
This place might just be the Barbie Diorama Capital of the World. Barbie got eaten by dinosaurs, blinged beyond belief, turned into a centaur, re-cast as Kathy Bates' character in Misery, and shish-kebobbed. And if you've ever thought to yourself, "Gee willikers, why won't someone just give Barbie nipples already," well, you're in the right place.
My personal favorite was Barbie's Last Sleepover:
Description: "The lead Barbie is dressed in a white velvet robe as she holds out her arms to welcome her 12 followers. Some are White, some Black, some Asian and some Latin. Each of the 12 is dressed uniquely in a velvet robe with a matching scarf around their hair. Maybe they just took a shower and are eating before the sleep over. I made the bread of Polymer Clay and the glasses of wine out of ear ring findings. They set on benches around a long table covered with an amber velvet cloth." Price: $800.
We must have spent the better part of an hour looking at Barbie in all her various guises. It was...I'm not sure what it was, but it certainly wasn't the usual. Because I take my sister only to the best places in town.
I didn't spend the $800 it would take to own Barbie's Last Sleepover for myself, but I got several cards with this image on it. If you're very nice, maybe I'll send you one for Easter.
Monday, March 12, 2012
What's wrong with raising awareness?
I'm sorry, but you're just going to have to put up with this Kony 2012 obsession of mine for a bit longer.
As I've been reading various posts responding to the Kony 2012 campaign, one response comes up over and over again in the comments: "At least they're raising awareness, and that's a good thing. No one else has ever gotten anyone to pay any attention to the situation in Northern Uganda, so quit your armchair quibbling!"
So what's wrong with raising awareness?
And the answer is of course there is nothing inherently wrong with raising awareness, just as there is nothing inherently wrong with chocolate pie. (mmm...chocolate pie...) But not all awareness-raising is created equal. Raising awareness, like eating a chocolate pie, requires both discipline and discernment. And if you don't have any discipline or discernment, well, people are going to feed you all kinds of stuff. (You've read/seen The Help, haven't you?)
There are three ways I can think of that "raising awareness" can be misused: when information is presented out of context, out of proportion, or as an end in itself--or a combination of the three. A quick look at each.
1. Out of context No one can give the full context for a complex situation, and certainly not when they're trying to catch our eye when we're thinking about other things. It would be wonderful to believe that each and every awareness-raising organization is doing its utmost to present a persuasive yet accurate picture of the whole situation. But when an organization is appealing for our time, money, or action, it is often in their interests to leave out complicating details.
2. Out of proportion Of course an organization that's focused on a cause that is the most important thing to them is going to want you to make that your most important cause too. But watch out when there is an insistent urgency. Watch out for the word "now." Organizations want you to care about their cause; that is their job. But just because they say something is the most important thing to be done this very instant doesn't mean it is.
3. An end in itself I worry about organizations or movements (I'm looking at you, Occupy Wall Street) that only want to raise awareness. OK, so I'm aware; now what? Are they done now? Or will they not be satisfied until they are absolutely sure that everyone, everywhere knows--and wears the right color ribbon to prove it (I'm looking at you, Susan G. Komen). If the cause is important, then something in the world needs to change. What an organization chooses to do is important. Awareness is not enough.
But I don't blame any organization for doing the best to promote its cause however it can. It is incumbent upon us as potential supporters to do due diligence: to find out more, to learn about the cause, to discover what the organization actually hopes to accomplish, and to discern whether that meshes with our own hopes and goals for a better world.
An important cause deserves to be taken seriously. If you really don't know anything about it--and refuse to listen to anyone other than the organization who does--then I need to ask, how aware are you?
As I've been reading various posts responding to the Kony 2012 campaign, one response comes up over and over again in the comments: "At least they're raising awareness, and that's a good thing. No one else has ever gotten anyone to pay any attention to the situation in Northern Uganda, so quit your armchair quibbling!"
So what's wrong with raising awareness?
And the answer is of course there is nothing inherently wrong with raising awareness, just as there is nothing inherently wrong with chocolate pie. (mmm...chocolate pie...) But not all awareness-raising is created equal. Raising awareness, like eating a chocolate pie, requires both discipline and discernment. And if you don't have any discipline or discernment, well, people are going to feed you all kinds of stuff. (You've read/seen The Help, haven't you?)
There are three ways I can think of that "raising awareness" can be misused: when information is presented out of context, out of proportion, or as an end in itself--or a combination of the three. A quick look at each.
1. Out of context No one can give the full context for a complex situation, and certainly not when they're trying to catch our eye when we're thinking about other things. It would be wonderful to believe that each and every awareness-raising organization is doing its utmost to present a persuasive yet accurate picture of the whole situation. But when an organization is appealing for our time, money, or action, it is often in their interests to leave out complicating details.
2. Out of proportion Of course an organization that's focused on a cause that is the most important thing to them is going to want you to make that your most important cause too. But watch out when there is an insistent urgency. Watch out for the word "now." Organizations want you to care about their cause; that is their job. But just because they say something is the most important thing to be done this very instant doesn't mean it is.
3. An end in itself I worry about organizations or movements (I'm looking at you, Occupy Wall Street) that only want to raise awareness. OK, so I'm aware; now what? Are they done now? Or will they not be satisfied until they are absolutely sure that everyone, everywhere knows--and wears the right color ribbon to prove it (I'm looking at you, Susan G. Komen). If the cause is important, then something in the world needs to change. What an organization chooses to do is important. Awareness is not enough.
But I don't blame any organization for doing the best to promote its cause however it can. It is incumbent upon us as potential supporters to do due diligence: to find out more, to learn about the cause, to discover what the organization actually hopes to accomplish, and to discern whether that meshes with our own hopes and goals for a better world.
An important cause deserves to be taken seriously. If you really don't know anything about it--and refuse to listen to anyone other than the organization who does--then I need to ask, how aware are you?
Compare and contrast
Last week, I posted a long response to the Kony 2012 viral video. In it, I suggested a number of questions for you to ask yourself when watching the video.
Yesterday, Ugandan blogger TMS Ruge (whom I quoted in my post) recommended a video by a different organization also working in Northern Uganda, called Hope North. I cannot tell you anything about this organization itself, but I do ask you to watch the video, which is 10 minutes shorter than Kony 2012, and ask yourself the same questions:
1. How are Africans portrayed?
Are they victims, villains, or heroes? Do they have power or are they powerless? What do they get to say for themselves? What actions do they ask others to take?
2. How is the West portrayed?
Again, victims, villains, or heroes? Do Westerners have power or are they powerless? What do they get to say about Africa?
3. Who gets to speak?
Pretty self-explanatory. But also note in what role people are cast when they speak and who gets to interrupt whom.
4. How does this video appeal to your emotions?
What techniques does it use to heighten emotions? When does it speak to you directly? What does this video tell you about you?
5. What does Hope North get out of this?
Not assigning any motives here, but what does this organization get if people participate? How does this campaign benefit them?
And I would add the following question:
6. Does watching this video change your image of what's happening in Northern Uganda?
Does it complicate things? Simplify things? Clarify things? Confuse things?
So what do you think?
Yesterday, Ugandan blogger TMS Ruge (whom I quoted in my post) recommended a video by a different organization also working in Northern Uganda, called Hope North. I cannot tell you anything about this organization itself, but I do ask you to watch the video, which is 10 minutes shorter than Kony 2012, and ask yourself the same questions:
1. How are Africans portrayed?
Are they victims, villains, or heroes? Do they have power or are they powerless? What do they get to say for themselves? What actions do they ask others to take?
2. How is the West portrayed?
Again, victims, villains, or heroes? Do Westerners have power or are they powerless? What do they get to say about Africa?
3. Who gets to speak?
Pretty self-explanatory. But also note in what role people are cast when they speak and who gets to interrupt whom.
4. How does this video appeal to your emotions?
What techniques does it use to heighten emotions? When does it speak to you directly? What does this video tell you about you?
5. What does Hope North get out of this?
Not assigning any motives here, but what does this organization get if people participate? How does this campaign benefit them?
And I would add the following question:
6. Does watching this video change your image of what's happening in Northern Uganda?
Does it complicate things? Simplify things? Clarify things? Confuse things?
So what do you think?
Labels:
looking at images,
philanthropy,
stereotypes,
Uganda
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Sunday Funnies, March 11
I've never had anything remotely like this happen to me.
Nope. Can't imagine what that feels like.
h/t and thanks to my sister for sharing this with me. Great seeing you this week!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


